10 Simple Ways To Speed Up Your Python Code

Why should you care about your Python code performance?

Let's be honest first, you're not using Python in your project because it's a fast programming language, but because it's easy for you to translate your idea into real life working product. So from the beginning, speed is not a problem for you, so why should you even bother to spend your precious time upgrading it? For me, writting code is not just putting sloppy working pieces together and then call it a day. I want to learn more about how to write faster, cleaner and simpler code. Because of this, I've been looking around for ways to increase my Python code's performanc ewithout sacrificing its readability. Let me show you the way of the force!

1. Choose wisely between "Ask for Forgiveness" and "Look before you leap"

• Ask for forgiveness: You run your code like normal, then wrap them in the try/catch block.

try: with open("path/to/file.txt", "r") as fp: return fp.read() except IOError: # Handle the error or just ignore it 

Exit fullscreen mode

• Look before you leap: Try to check everything possible that can result in a bug or crash in you code before you run it.

# Check if file exists and if we have the permission to read it if Path("/path/to/file").exists() and os.access("path/to/file.txt", os.R_OK): with open("path/to/file.txt") as input_file: return input_file.read() 

Exit fullscreen mode

• When to use which: In most cases, "Look before you leap" is slower than "Ask for forgiveness" (~30-80% slower). But only in cases where you expect your code to fail alot, then "Look before you leap" should be faster (4x faster). Because handling exceptions is very expensive

2. How to properly filter a list:

There are 3 popular ways to filter a list in Python:

• For Loop: This is the basic way to get your job done, it's easy to read and understand.

# Get all even numbers in the list contains 1 million number def filter_odd_number(): lst = list(range(1000000)) res = [] for item in lst: if item % 2 == 0: res.append(item) return res 

Exit fullscreen mode

• List Comprehension: Your code will be drastically faster (~50% faster) than the normal for loop, and shorter as well. It's faster than the for loop because when you use a for loop, on every iteration, you have to look up the variable holding the list and then call its append() function. This doesn't happen in a list comprehension. Instead, there is a special bytecode instruction LIST_APPEND that will append the current value to the list you're constructing.

def filter_odd_number(): lst = list(range(1000000)) return [item for item in lst if item % 2 == 0] 

Exit fullscreen mode

• Python built-in filter() function: This function will return a generator rather than the whole list at once. If you want to get the whole list at once, this should be the worst performance-wise option.

def filter_odd_number(): lst = list(range(1000000)) return filter(lambda x: x % 2 == 0, lst) 

Exit fullscreen mode

• When to use which: Most of the time, list comprehension is the winner, it's faster, shorter and some may say it looks cooler as well. But it has 1 limitation is that you cannot pact multiple statements inside of it, but don't worry, you can always wrap your logic inside a function and use it inside a list comprehension. But if you have a realy big list (I'm talking billions of item) then consider using filter(), you definitely don't want your big list to be duplicated.
• Note: Dictionary comprehension is also faster than normal for loop for many tasks

3. Checking for True or False

We have 3 ways to achieve this:

• if var == True : This is bad, ~120% slower than the winner
• if var is True : This is also bad, ~60% slower than the winner
• if var : Good, recommended by PEP8
• The winner is clearly if var

Wait, it's not going to be that easy. In Python, there's a concept called "truthy & falsy", it means that there are variables interpreted as True or False if you run bool(variable) (explicitly by you or by the interpreter when you put them behind the if clause). Now, you may have different logic to deal with a certain type of the data.

var = [] # or None or True if len(var) == 0: print("empty") elif var is None: print("null") elif var is True: print(true) 

Exit fullscreen mode

• To check if a variable is equal to True/False (and you don't have to distinguish between True/False and truthy / falsy values), use if variable or if not variable. It's the simplest and fastest way to do this.
• To check that a variable is explicitly True or False (and is not truthy/falsy), use is ( if variable is True ).
• To check if a variable is equal to 0 or if a list is empty, use if variable == 0 or if variable == [] .

4. Use in to check if item exists in a collections of item

• in in a powerful tool to check if an item is in a list/set/tuple or a dictionary (use in would only check if a Key exists in a dictionary ). Do not use for to do this kind of task (~50% slower)
• Note: If you need to "check for membership" a lot, then you should consider using dict or set to store your items, because they have constant average lookup time.

5. Remove duplicate value inside a list

There should be many ways to implement this task, but 3 stand out the most:

• Use for loop or list comprehension to manually remove duplicate value: Slow and takes longer to implement
• Use list(set(arr)) to do the trick: This is ths fastest and shortest way as well, too bad they're going to shuffle the order of your original list (if you don't care about it then good!)
• Use list(dict.fromkeys(arr)) for Python 3.6 and above or list(OrderedDict.fromkeys(arr)) : This code is a little slower than the set way but it will keep your original list order

6. Declare a data structure in style

When you need to declare an empty list , dict , tuple or set , you should use the Pythonista syntax rather than explicitly call the function because it will be faster and shorter to (~100% faster). This is because when you call the function, Python would then try to check if there's any other function with that name in your script before thinking about using its own

• List: Use [] instead of list()
• Dict: Use <> instead of dict()
• Tuple: Use () instead of tuple()
• Set: Use instead of set([x])

7. String format

Python 3.6 introduce the famous f-string for us to build formated string (before that we have to use the .format() or Template string) and since then it's hard to find someone who doesn't love them! But is it the optimal way to create a format string?

• Yes, f-string perform consistently better than its competitor, here's an example

name, age = "Triet", 24 s = f"My name is name>, I'm age> years old" 

Exit fullscreen mode

• The "concat string" is also an honorable mention, but its performance is as consistent as the f-string (sometimes it's even faster than the f-string)

8. Map vs List Comprehension

In the previous section, I've said that you should always use "List comprehension" instead of for loop for tasks that require you to loop over a list. One big problem with that is "List comprehension" cannot take too many logic inside (without ruin your beautiful code), so my solution back there is to wrap that logic into a function, then call it inside of the "List comprehension". It's a good work around, But should you do it?

• No you should not! Use map() instead. map() is faster (~50%) and easier to write as well. Here's an example:

def pow2(x): return x**2 arr = list(range(1000000)) res = list(map(pow2, arr)) 

Exit fullscreen mode

Why we need the list() outside of map() you asked? Well map() return a generator which would return item one by one when you call it, so list should get the whole result and put them back inside a list

9. Inlining Functions

• This is one way to increase your code performance that go against the concept of beautiful code - Try to wrap the whole function's logic in just one line. And yes, it may sound silly at first but it's actually work (~100% faster)! Here's an example

def inline_functions(): return sum([sum([sum([1 for _ in range(100)]) for _ in range(100)]) for _ in range(100)]) 

Exit fullscreen mode

I've won. But at what cost?

• This should only be done with function that has so little logic inside! please don't hurt your colleague.

10. Upgrade your Python version

• Yes, you heard me, go upgrade your Python version, it's free and can affect instantly! Python 3.11 is 10-60% faster than Python 3.10

Reference

• Sebastion Witowski's blog: https://switowski.com/blog